Impact of molecular tumour board discussion on targeted therapy allocation in advanced prostate cancer

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Slootbeek, P. H.J. Peter
Kloots, I.S.H. Iris
Smits, M. Minke
Oort, I.M. Inge
Gerritsen, W.R. Winald
Schalken, J.A. Jack
Ligtenberg, M.J.L. Marjolijn
Grünberg, K. Katrien
Kroeze, L. Leonie
Bloemendal, H.J. Haiko

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Molecular tumour boards (MTB) optimally match oncological therapies to patients with genetic aberrations. Prostate cancer (PCa) is underrepresented in these MTB discussions. This study describes the impact of routine genetic profiling and MTB referral on the outcome of PCa patients in a tertiary referral centre. METHODS: All PCa patients that received next-generation sequencing results and/or were discussed at an MTB between Jan 1, 2017 and Jan 1, 2020 were included. Genetically matched therapies (GMT) in clinical trials or compassionate use were linked to actionable alterations. Response to these agents was retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Out of the 277 genetically profiled PCa patients, 215 (78%) were discussed in at least one MTB meeting. A GMT was recommended to 102 patients (47%), of which 63 patients (62%) initiated the GMT. The most recommended therapies were PARP inhibitors (n = 74), programmed death-(ligand) 1 inhibitors (n = 21) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (n = 19). Once started, 41.3% had a PFS of ≥6 months, 43.5% a PSA decline ≥50% and 38.5% an objective radiographic response. CONCLUSION: Recommendation for a GMT is achieved in almost half of the patients with advanced prostate cancer, with GMT initiation leading to durable responses in over 40% of patients. These data justify routine referral of selected PCa patients to MTB's.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By